Letter 113: Leo, bishop of Rome, to Julian, bishop of Cos. I acknowledge in your letter, beloved, the feelings of brotherly love, in that you sympathize with us in true grief at the many grievous evils we have borne. But we pray that these things which the Lord has either allowed or wished us to suffer, may avail to the correction of those who live through ...

Pope Leo the GreatJulian of Antioch|c. 454 AD|leo great
christologydiplomaticimperial politicsmonasticismpapal authority
Theological controversy; Church council; Travel & mobility

Leo, Bishop of Rome, to Julian, Bishop of Cos.

I. After expressing thanks for Julian's sympathy, he protests the removal of Aetius from the archdeaconry

I recognize in your letter, beloved, the sentiments of brotherly affection, in that you share our genuine grief at the many grievous trials we have endured. But we pray that these afflictions, which the Lord has either permitted or willed us to suffer, may serve to correct those who survive them, and that adversities may cease when the offenses that provoked them are abandoned. Both results will follow through the mercy of God, if only He will remove the scourge and turn the hearts of His people back to Himself.

But while you, brother, are saddened by the hostilities that have raged around us, I in turn am made anxious because -- as your letter indicates -- the treacherous attacks of heretics have not ceased in the church of Constantinople, and men still seek occasions to persecute those who have been defenders of the Catholic faith.

For as long as Aetius is removed from his office of archdeacon under the pretense of promotion, and Andrew -- who had been rejected for associating with heretics -- is installed in his place; as long as respect is shown to the accusers of Flavian of blessed memory, and the partners and disciples of that most devout confessor are suppressed, it is all too clear what pleases the bishop of that church. I defer taking action against him until I hear the full merits of the case and await his own response.

II. The 28th canon of Chalcedon remains unacceptable

Furthermore, I am compelled to repeat what I have already stated: the resolution passed at Chalcedon concerning the privileges of the see of Constantinople is null and void. It was enacted in violation of the canons of Nicaea, without the assent of the Apostolic See, and must not be enforced. The ancient ordering of the churches must be preserved, and the bishop of Constantinople must be content with the honor that properly belongs to his see without grasping at what belongs to others.

I charge you, brother, to continue your watchful care over these matters, and to report to us without delay anything that threatens the peace of the Church or the integrity of the faith.

Modern English rendering for readability. See the 19th-century translation or original Latin/Greek for scholarly use.

Related Letters