Letter 75

Cyprian of CarthageMagnus, on Baptizing Novatians, and Those Who Obtain Grace on a Sick-Bed|c. 257 AD|cyprian carthage
barbarian invasionconversiongrief deathillnessimperial politicspapal authorityproperty economicstravel mobility

Cyprian to his son Magnus, greetings.

With your characteristic care and devotion, dearest son, you have consulted me about whether those who come from Novatian's group, after his profane washing, ought to be baptized and sanctified in the Catholic Church with the true, lawful, and only baptism of the Church.

In reply, I say — drawing on what my faith and the truth of the divine Scriptures allow — that no heretics and schismatics have any power or right whatsoever in this matter. Novatian should not be exempt from this rule, since he too stands outside the Church and acts in opposition to the peace and love of Christ. He must be counted among adversaries and antichrists. For our Lord Jesus Christ, testifying in his Gospel, did not single out any particular species of heresy. He made a universal statement: "He who is not with me is against me, and he who does not gather with me scatters" [Matthew 12:30]. And the Apostle John drew no distinctions either: "You have heard that Antichrist is coming, and already many antichrists have come. They went out from us, but they were not of us; for if they had been of us, they would have remained with us" [1 John 2:18-19].

All who depart from the love and unity of the Catholic Church are adversaries of the Lord and antichrists. It does not matter what name they give their faction or what claims they make.

As for Novatian's claim to legitimacy: he cannot hold what he never lawfully received. The episcopal succession at Rome runs from Peter through Fabian to Cornelius — ordained by the judgment of God, the vote of the clergy, and the consent of the people. Cornelius became bishop when no one else occupied the chair. Novatian never held it; he invented his own. A man who has no legitimate ordination has no authority, and his sacraments have no power.

You also asked about those who receive baptism during serious illness — by sprinkling rather than full immersion — whether they should be considered legitimately baptized. On this point: no one should be troubled. The grace of God is not diminished by the method of its delivery. When a sick person, confined to bed, receives the water of salvation — even by sprinkling — the gift is complete. The Holy Spirit is not measured out in portions. The sick receive no less grace than the healthy.

However, if someone recovers from the illness in which they were baptized, let them not be disturbed or re-baptized, as if their baptism were somehow deficient. They should simply receive the laying on of hands from the bishop and the seal of the Lord, to complete what was begun.

Farewell, dearest son.

[Context: This letter addresses two distinct questions. The first — whether Novatian converts need baptism — extends Cyprian's broader argument about heretical baptism to the specific case of the Novatians, whom Cyprian treats as no different from any other schismatic group. The second question, about "clinical baptism" (baptism of the gravely ill by sprinkling rather than immersion), is historically significant: Cyprian firmly defends its validity, establishing an important precedent that the Church later universally accepted.]

Modern English rendering for readability. See the 19th-century translation or original Latin/Greek for scholarly use.

Related Letters