Letter 55: I have given patient attention to your letter, and I am astonished that when you are perfectly well able to furnish me with a short and easy defense by taking action at once, you should choose to persist in what is my ground of complaint, and endeavour to cure the incurable by writing a long story about it. I am not the first, Paregorius, nor th...

Basil of CaesareaParegorius, presbyter|c. 360 AD|basil caesarea
illnessmonasticismwomen
Church council; Military conflict; Economic matters

To Paregorius, the Presbyter.

I have given patient thought to the case you presented to me, and I see no way around the canonical requirement. The man in question, whatever his other merits, has contracted a second marriage, and by the canons of the Church he is thereby excluded from the presbyterate. I understand that this ruling causes disappointment — both to him and to you, since you had hoped to present him as a candidate. But the canons exist for good reason, and if we begin making exceptions whenever the circumstances seem sympathetic, we will soon have no canons at all.

Let me add a word of consolation. Exclusion from the clergy is not exclusion from the Church, nor from the love of God, nor from the respect of his fellow Christians. He may serve Christ faithfully as a layman and earn rewards no less than those of any presbyter. The error would be to treat ordination as a reward for virtue, rather than as what it actually is: a specific office with specific requirements. A man may be wholly virtuous and still not meet those requirements. There is no shame in that.

Modern English rendering for readability. See the 19th-century translation or original Latin/Greek for scholarly use.

Related Letters