Letter 16: He who maintains that it is possible to arrive at the discovery of things actually existing, has no doubt by some orderly method advanced his intelligence by means of the knowledge of actually existing things. It is after first training himself by the apprehension of small and easily comprehensible objects, that he brings his apprehensive facult...

Basil of CaesareaUnknown|c. 358 AD|basil caesarea
arianismtravel mobility
Travel & mobility; Economic matters

Anyone who claims they can fully comprehend the nature of reality itself has presumably worked their way up methodically — starting with small, graspable things before tackling what lies beyond all human understanding.

So here's a test. You boast that you've grasped the nature of actual existence? Fine. Explain the nature of the smallest visible creature for me. Tell me everything about the ant.

Does it breathe? Does it have a skeleton? Are its parts held together by tendons and ligaments? Are the tendons wrapped in muscles and glands? Does it have a spinal cord running from head to tail along vertebrae? Does a nervous membrane drive its limbs? Does it have a liver — and a gall bladder beside it? Kidneys? A heart? Arteries, veins, membranes, cartilage? Is it hairy or hairless? Does it have a solid hoof, or are its feet divided? How long does it live? How does it reproduce? What is its gestation period? Why do some ants walk while others fly — some crawling on the ground, others traveling through the air?

The person who prides himself on knowing the nature of reality should be able to answer these questions about a common ant. Once he's done that, he can move on to giving us a physiological account of the Power that transcends all human intelligence.

But if your knowledge can't yet explain the nature of an insignificant ant, how can you claim to comprehend the nature of the incomprehensible God?

Modern English rendering for readability. See the 19th-century translation or original Latin/Greek for scholarly use.

Related Letters