Letter 61: 1. I have resolved to commit to writing in this letter what I said when you and I were conversing together as to the terms on which we would welcome clergy of the party of Donatus desiring to become Catholics, in order that, if any one asked you what are our sentiments and practice in regard to this, you might exhibit these by producing what I h...

Augustine of HippoTheodorus|c. 396 AD|augustine hippo
donatismgrief deathimperial politicsmonasticismproperty economics
Theological controversy; Travel & mobility; Military conflict

Letter 61 — To Theodorus: A Written Statement on Receiving Donatist Clergy (A.D. 401)

To his well-beloved and honored brother Theodorus, Bishop — Augustine sends greetings in the Lord.

I have decided to put in writing what I said to you in our recent conversation about the terms on which we would receive clergy from the Donatist party who wish to become Catholics. That way, if anyone asks you what our position and practice is in this matter, you can simply produce this document in my own hand.

Know, therefore, that the only thing we reject in the Donatist clergy is precisely what makes them schismatics and heretics: their separation from the unity and truth of the Catholic Church, their refusal to remain at peace with the people of God spread throughout the whole world, and their refusal to recognize Christ's baptism as valid in those who received it outside their party. That grievous error we reject. But the name of God that they bear, and the sacrament they have received, we acknowledge in them and embrace with reverence and love. It is for that very reason — because we recognize what is good in them — that we grieve over their wandering, and long to win them for God through the love of Christ, so that the holy sacrament which is now working their destruction outside the Church may work their salvation within it.

When anyone comes to us from the Donatist party, we do not welcome the evil that belongs to them — their error and their schism. These are the only obstacles to our unity; once they are removed, we embrace our brothers. We stand with them, as the apostle says, "in the unity of the Spirit, in the bond of peace" (Ephesians 4:3). We acknowledge the good things in them that come from God — their baptism, the grace conferred by ordination, their profession of asceticism, their vow of celibacy, their faith in the Trinity, and the like. All of these they possessed before, but profited from none of them — because they had no charity. For what truth is there in someone's profession of Christian love, when that person refuses to embrace Christian unity?

When they come into the Catholic Church, they gain not what they already had, but what they lacked: those things they possessed begin, at last, to be of profit to them. In the Catholic Church they find the root of charity in the bond of peace and the fellowship of unity, so that all the sacraments of truth they hold serve not to condemn them but to deliver them. Branches must not boast that they are wood from the vine and not from the thorn, if they do not live by union to the root — for such branches shall be cast into the fire. But of some branches that were broken off, the apostle says that "God is able to graft them in again" (Romans 11:23).

Therefore, dear brother, if you see anyone from the Donatist party uncertain about the terms on which we will receive them, show them this document in my handwriting, which you know well, and let them read it if they wish. I call God as my witness — upon my soul — that I will receive them on these terms: they will retain not only the baptism of Christ they have received, but also the honor due to their holy vows and their ascetic virtue.

Farewell in the Lord.

Modern English rendering for readability. See the 19th-century translation or original Latin/Greek for scholarly use.

Related Letters