Letter 53: 1. Since you were pleased to acquaint us with the letter sent to you by a Donatist presbyter, although, with the spirit of a true Catholic, you regarded it with contempt, nevertheless, to aid you in seeking his welfare if his folly be not incurable, we beg you to forward to him the following reply. He wrote that an angel had enjoined him to decl...

Augustine of HippoGenerosus|c. 395 AD|augustine hippo
christologydonatismimperial politicsmonasticismpapal authorityproperty economicsslavery captivitytravel mobility
Theological controversy; Imperial politics; Church council

Augustine to Generosus, greetings.

You have asked me for a clear account of why we — the Catholic communion — believe that ours is the true Church and that the Donatists are in schism. I will give you the clearest account I can, and I will try to do it without rancor, because the truth does not need anger to defend it.

The first and most important thing to understand is this: the Church of Christ is not confined to North Africa. The Lord said to his apostles: "You will be my witnesses in Jerusalem, in all Judea and Samaria, and to the ends of the earth" [Acts 1:8]. The Church is spread throughout the world — in Rome, in Constantinople, in Antioch, in Alexandria, in Spain, in Gaul, in the islands of the sea. All of these communities are in communion with one another. They recognize each other's baptism, share each other's bread, receive each other's letters of commendation.

The Donatists are in communion with none of them. Their community exists only in Africa. Now ask yourself: is it more likely that the entire world is wrong and one province is right? Or that one province has separated itself from the whole and calls its separation purity?

Second: the origins of the schism. The Donatists claim that Caecilian, Bishop of Carthage, was invalidly ordained because one of his consecrators was a traditor. This claim was investigated by councils at Rome and Arles and by the Emperor Constantine himself. In every case, the charges against Caecilian were found to be either unproven or fabricated. The Donatists rejected these verdicts — but rejecting a verdict is not the same as overturning it.

Third: the theological principle. Even if the charges against Caecilian's consecrator had been true — even if Felix of Aptunga had been the worst of the traditores — it would not have invalidated Caecilian's ordination. The sacraments do not depend on the worthiness of the minister but on the faithfulness of God. Otherwise, as I keep saying, no one could ever be certain of anything.

I lay these things before you, brother, not to win an argument but to clear a path. The path leads back to unity, and unity is where Christ is.

Farewell.

Modern English rendering for readability. See the 19th-century translation or original Latin/Greek for scholarly use.

Related Letters