Letter 63: Limenius, Bishop of Vercellæ, having died, the see remained long vacant owing to domestic factions. St. Ambrose, therefore, as Exarch, writes to the Christians at Vercellæ, and commences by reference to the speedy and unanimous election of Eusebius, a former Bishop, and reminds them of the presence of Christ as a reason for concord.

Ambrose of MilanChurch of Neocaesarea|c. 397 AD|ambrose milan
arianismbarbarian invasionconversioneducation booksfamine plaguegrief deathhumorillnessimperial politicsmonasticismproperty economicsslavery captivitytravel mobilitywomen
Barbarian peoples/invasions; Theological controversy; Imperial politics
From: Ambrose, Bishop of Milan (as metropolitan)
To: The Church at Vercellae
Date: ~396 AD
Context: A long and authoritative letter to a divided congregation unable to elect a bishop — Ambrose intervenes as metropolitan, drawing on the examples of past bishops of Vercellae to define what the church needs in its leader, and inveighs against two apostate monks who have corrupted the community.

Ambrose, a servant of Christ, called to be a bishop, to the church of Vercellae and to all who call on the name of our Lord Jesus Christ: grace be fulfilled in you from God the Father and his only-begotten Son, in the Holy Spirit.

I am spent with grief that the church of God among you is still without a bishop, and that now alone of all the churches of Liguria, Aemilia, the Venetiae, and the neighboring parts of Italy, it needs the care that other churches were accustomed to seek from it. What is an even greater source of shame to me: the divisions among you that prevent the election are laid at my door.

Since there are factions among you, how can we make a decree? How can you elect? How can anyone agree to take up this burden? Let me remind you of how things were done before.

When the blessed Eusebius [the first bishop of Vercellae, exiled for opposing Arianism under Constantius II] was elected, there was no delay, no faction, no scheming. The people came together, the clergy agreed, and the choice was made swiftly and unanimously. Eusebius did not campaign for the office. He did not buy support. He did not flatter the powerful. He was chosen because he was worthy — and he proved his worthiness by enduring exile for the faith.

Consider also Dionysius [bishop of Milan, exiled to Cappadocia under Constantius II for supporting Athanasius]. He lost his see, his city, his homeland — everything but his conscience. These were men who understood that a bishop's office is not a prize to be won but a cross to be carried.

But I must speak about the cancer in your community before I can discuss the cure. You have among you two apostate monks — Sarmatio and Barbatianus — who abandoned their monastic vows, returned to the pleasures of the world, and now corrupt others with their example. They dress like monks but live like libertines. They affect holiness in public and pursue indulgence in private. They have drawn others after them into the same ruin.

I say plainly: a man who abandons the monastic life for the world has not found freedom; he has found a different kind of slavery. The flesh he thought he had conquered has conquered him. The devil he thought he had defeated was merely waiting.

Sensuality degrades men below the beasts. Animals follow their nature; the lustful man betrays his. Animals do not know better; the monk who falls does know better, and falls anyway. The apostle Paul says: "It is a shame even to speak of what they do in secret" [Ephesians 5:12]. I will not describe what these men have done. The community knows.

Now, to the virtues required in a bishop. He must be irreproachable — not merely in the obvious sense of being free from scandal, but in the deeper sense of being above the suspicion that scandal creates. He must be hospitable, gentle, sober, prudent, and dignified. He must be able to teach — not from books alone, but from the authority of a life lived consistently. He must govern his own household well, "for if a man does not know how to manage his own household, how can he take care of the church of God?" [1 Timothy 3:5].

The bishop you choose must be a man of learning, but not mere academic learning. He must know Scripture the way a soldier knows his weapons — intimately, practically, ready to deploy at a moment's notice. He must be gentle with the weak and firm with the obstinate. He must pray without ceasing and give without counting. He must love the poor, not merely pity them.

I would prefer that you choose a man from the monastic life — but only if he has proven himself in that life, not fled from it. The clerical life and the monastic life are not the same, though they share much. A good monk is not automatically a good bishop, any more than a good soldier is automatically a good general. The skills are different. But the foundation — discipline, prayer, self-denial, obedience — must be the same.

Do not choose a man for his wealth, his connections, or his eloquence. Choose him for his character, his faith, and his pastoral heart. And when you have chosen, support him. A bishop without his people's support is a shepherd without a flock — and a flock without a shepherd is what you are now.

I urge you in the name of Christ: end your divisions. Elect your bishop. Restore the honor of a church that was once the light of northern Italy. The memory of Eusebius demands it. The faith demands it. Your own salvation demands it.

May the peace of God, which passes all understanding, guard your hearts and minds in Christ Jesus [Philippians 4:7].

Modern English rendering for readability. See the 19th-century translation or original Latin/Greek for scholarly use.

Related Letters