Letter 40: St. Ambrose begs Theodosius to listen to him, as he cannot be silent without great risk to both. He points out that Theodosius though God-fearing may be led astray, and points out that his decision respecting the restoration of the Jewish synagogue is full of peril, exposing the bishop to the danger of either acting against the truth or of death.

Ambrose of MilanEmperor Theodosius I|c. 388 AD|ambrose milan
barbarian invasiondiplomaticgrief deathillnessimperial politicsmonasticismproperty economicsslavery captivity
Barbarian peoples/invasions; Theological controversy; Imperial politics
From: Ambrose, Bishop of Milan
To: Emperor Theodosius
Date: ~388 AD
Context: One of the most consequential letters in church-state relations — Ambrose demands that Theodosius rescind his order forcing a bishop to rebuild a synagogue burned by Christians, arguing that no Christian authority should be compelled to fund a place of worship hostile to Christ.

Ambrose, Bishop, to the most merciful prince and most blessed Emperor Theodosius.

I am constantly burdened with cares, most blessed Emperor, but I have never been in such distress as now. I see that I must take every precaution against anything that might be charged to me as approaching sacrilege. I beg you: hear me with patience. If I am unworthy to be heard by you, then I am unworthy to make offerings on your behalf — I, to whom you have entrusted your vows and prayers. Will you not hear the man you wish God to hear for you? Will you not hear him pleading his own cause, when you have heard him pleading for others?

It is not an emperor's right to deny freedom of speech, and it is not a priest's right to hide what he thinks. Nothing makes an emperor more beloved by his people than a love of liberty, even in those who are subject to his military command. The difference between good rulers and bad is precisely this: good rulers love freedom; tyrants love servitude. And nothing is more dangerous for a priest before God, more shameful before men, than to fail to speak his conscience freely. As the Psalmist says: "I spoke your testimonies before kings, and was not ashamed" [Psalm 119:46].

Here is the matter. Reports have reached you that at Callinicum [a town on the Euphrates, in modern Syria], a synagogue was burned by Christians at the instigation of the local bishop, and that a Valentinian meeting-house [a Gnostic sect] was also destroyed. You have ordered the bishop to rebuild the synagogue at his own expense, and the monks who participated in the destruction of the Valentinian building to be punished.

I must speak plainly. Your order places the bishop in an impossible situation. If he obeys, he becomes an apostate — building with Christian hands and Christian money a place where Christ is denied. If he disobeys, he becomes a martyr. Either way, the church loses and the synagogue wins. Is this truly your intention?

I do not argue that the synagogue should have been burned. But the remedy is worse than the offense. The bishop could in good conscience obey a fine or accept imprisonment. He cannot in any conscience build a synagogue. If he does, it ceases to be a place of Jewish worship and becomes a monument to the emperor's power over the bishop's faith. And if the bishop refuses and is punished for refusing, you will have created a martyr — and every Christian in the empire will know it.

There is no parallel in the other direction. The Jews have burned churches — in Damascus, in Gaza, in Ascalon, in Berytus. Did any emperor order the synagogue authorities to rebuild those churches? No. Why should the rule apply in only one direction? When Christians suffer, it is called the will of God. When Jews suffer, it is called an outrage requiring imperial intervention.

Consider Julian the Apostate. He ordered the Jews to rebuild their temple in Jerusalem. What happened? Fire burst from the foundations and consumed the workers. Even the elements refused to cooperate. Shall a Christian emperor succeed where an apostate failed?

I do not want you to commit sacrilege for my sake, Emperor — for sacrilege against the church is sacrilege against God. I warn you as the prophet Nathan warned David — not because I consider myself Nathan's equal, but because the duty is the same. When a priest sees danger to the faith and stays silent, he is guilty of the consequences.

Reverse the order. Punish the rioters if justice demands it — but do not compel a Christian bishop to build a synagogue. That is not justice. That is a triumph of those who deny Christ over those who confess him.

If you will not hear me as a counselor, hear me at least as an intercessor. I would rather owe you gratitude for mercy than bear the burden of knowing I stood by while the church was humiliated.

I have warned you. The rest is between you and God.

Modern English rendering for readability. See the 19th-century translation or original Latin/Greek for scholarly use.

Related Letters